Red-team your AI before someone else does
Point Ryvx at an AI system you own. Eleven attack categories run live against it, checking whether it can be talked past the boundary you declared, and it hands back a coverage report that states what it tried, what it found, and what it did not test.
An empty findings list is not a clean bill of health, and this product says so on its own report.
Eleven attack categories, run against the live endpoint.
Each one tries a different route past the tool-permission boundary you declare for the agent.
Every risk gets one of three answers, never a silent blank.
For each of the ten OWASP LLM Top 10 risks, per run:
A working weakness was surfaced and reported.
Not a pass: only that this run's specific attacks didn't surface a weakness.
Stated with the reason on the row, never a silent blank.
Priced inside Strike's strength ladder. No separate list.
AI/LLM agent red-teaming is priced the same way a Strike scan is: strength alone sets the credits, quick at 20 credits, standard at 50 credits, deep at 100 credits. There is no separate AI-security price list.
See plans and pricing →The parts a sceptical engineer would poke at, stated first.
8 of 10, not 10 of 10
The other two OWASP LLM risks are structural gaps that no black-box probe can close, ever.
Triage leads, mostly
In black-box mode, most verdicts are triage leads, not confirmed findings: only a planted canary, a declared false statement, and a measured amplification are directly confirmable without a tool-call trace.
No AI-regulation claim
No EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001 claim is made anywhere for this product.